From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 28 20:29:13 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8969616A403
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:29:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5340F449A4
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:29:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03DC1703F;
	Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:04:40 -0400."
	<20060628150227.R75801@fledge.watson.org> 
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:29:06 +0000
Message-ID: <28872.1151526546@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
Subject: Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:29:13 -0000

In message <20060628150227.R75801@fledge.watson.org>, "Andrew R. Reiter" writes
:
>
>I apologize for top posting, but I lost the email that I think my 
>point/question pertains to.
>
>Part of this seems to be for compatibility / merging from drivers of other 
>OSes, no?  If I am wrong, ignore me :-).  If this is the case, would it be 
>better to create some common other area for things of this nature so that 
>it suffices to allow builds, but does not infect other areas of our own 
>code base?

That's what I proposed too:  #include <sys/netbsd_compat.h>

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.