From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 20:09:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2BE106566C for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de) Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D17E8FC0A for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (p508FB23B.dip.t-dialin.net [80.143.178.59]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983791C0C0BEA; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 22:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <4FD0F1EC.4060109@redfish-solutions.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 22:09:14 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1D03F00E-2777-4B0B-8E1C-860EA115B6AF@lurchi.franken.de> <7731AEE8-D1BF-4297-8F75-454149D3E303@lurchi.franken.de> <5A4A73CF-95FB-4B33-9652-2E4FD517CF5F@lurchi.franken.de> <5399FCC6-BDC4-47DD-9948-ADD16264EE46@lurchi.franken.de> <8D7E9322-0973-4657-B3FE-8A480C0E0304@lurchi.franken.de> <4FD0F1EC.4060109@redfish-solutions.com> To: Philip Prindeville X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP_RECVTOS X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:09:18 -0000 On Jun 7, 2012, at 8:24 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > It might be nice to add a semantic that says, "when accepting = connections, match their TOS"... possibly adding ranges of permitted TOS = values. ... I would leave the matching to the application. However, the suggested patch only supports UDP sockets. Best regards Michael >=20 >=20 > On 6/6/12 4:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> *nod* sure, I just want to be sure that it's clearly documented what >> the option does. >>=20 >> If it just does UDP for now and not TCP, then so be it, as long as >> it's documented that way. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Adrian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20