From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jun 17 15:43: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.trigger.net (ns.trigger.net [204.50.18.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E38E37B406 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mike (wettoast.org [204.50.18.204]) by mail.trigger.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B46830914; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:40:12 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "David W. Chapman Jr." , "John Prince" Cc: Subject: RE: ATA Atapi 4.6 Release Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 18:40:12 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <20020617204825.GC25616@leviathan.inethouston.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of David W. Chapman Jr. Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 4:48 PM To: John Prince Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA Atapi 4.6 Release > > It appears the ATA code was MFC, and does not perform as one > would expect.. > > In simpler terms, it does not work correctly. > > We lose too much functionality to back out the MFC, the only known > problems that I know about are ATA tags which can be disabled. Could > you please specify which problems you are talking about? Out of curiosity, what great new things does the new ATA code offer? Nothing is really mentioned in the release notes, and I don't see any performance improvements or any other significant changes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message