From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 17 20:16:00 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395F416A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 May 2005 20:16:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69CC43D8E
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 May 2005 20:15:59 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net)
Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD))
	id 1DY8To-000NDa-GC; Tue, 17 May 2005 22:15:52 +0200
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:15:52 +0200
From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
To: Adam McLaurin <freebsd@irotas.net>
Message-ID: <20050517201552.GG66273@voodoo.oberon.net>
References: <1116297146.4271.234280167@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1116297146.4271.234280167@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon
X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE
Keywords: 579279786
cc: FreeBSD-Ports <ports@freebsd.org>
cc: shipley@dis.org
Subject: Re: net/libnet vs net/libnet-devel
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 20:16:00 -0000

On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:32:26PM -0400, Adam McLaurin wrote:
> Is there a particlar reason why we're hanging on to net/libnet v1.0.2a? 
> 
> v1.1.x was started in early 2003, which is when net/libnet-devel was
> introduced. However, according to 
> http://www.packetfactory.net/projects/libnet/ , v1.1.2.1 is the latest
> "stable", and v1.1.3 is the latest "beta".
> 
> Would it make sense to get rid of v1.0.2a, move v1.1.2.1 into
> net/libnet, and upgrade net/libnet-devel to v1.1.3 ?

The problem is, there are too many ports which are still depend on
net/libnet and don't work with development version, since ABI was
changed.

-Kirill