From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 01:00:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80CB16A4C1 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5415F43FBD for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 01:00:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@sunbay.com) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h9380AZ4059095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:00:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@sunbay.com) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9p2/8.12.8/Submit) id h9380ACv059090; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:00:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:00:10 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Mike Silbersack Message-ID: <20031003080010.GF53479@sunbay.com> References: <20031003070031.GL5194@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20031003023838.I16042@odysseus.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l+goss899txtYvYf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031003023838.I16042@odysseus.silby.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rtsock.c: eliminate masking of gotos, don't abuse M_RTABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 08:00:37 -0000 --l+goss899txtYvYf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:40:22AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >=20 > > Comments? > > > > BMS >=20 > I think that anything to clean up the routing table is a good idea... > however, aren't there a few major non-committed patches to this area which > are almost ready? (Sam's locking, someone else's moving cloned routes > into a tcpstatcache, more?) You should probably check on the status of > those projects first and make sure that you won't interfere with their > integration. >=20 I think these uncommitted patches will mostly affect route.c, while this patch is for rtsock.c, the route(4) interface with the kernel, which is unlikely to change a lot. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --l+goss899txtYvYf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/fSyKUkv4P6juNwoRAiBIAJ9bhLY2Gw+ruy1RAA28uV5JvKA1bACgiw5H 5kimAAiWblCgmcEFxbItb7s= =dJIs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l+goss899txtYvYf--