From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 29 09:45:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0900F37B401; Thu, 29 May 2003 09:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from foem.leiden.webweaving.org (fia224-72.dsl.hccnet.nl
	[62.251.72.224])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EA66443F85; Thu, 29 May 2003 09:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org)
Received: from foem (IDENT:chuckwebweaving.org@foem [10.11.0.2])
	h4TGjUv7092033;	Thu, 29 May 2003 18:45:30 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from dirkx@webweaving.org)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 18:45:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
X-X-Sender: dirkx@foem
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030529122926.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20030529184507.T22309-100000@foem>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: pcic setup / wi0 timeout
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 16:45:53 -0000



On Thu, 29 May 2003, John Baldwin wrote:

>
> On 29-May-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > OK.  You might have a little better luck with 5.1-BETA, or you might
> > not.  However, you might try http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/pir.c
> > as root and tell me if it finds a $PIR table.  The boot verbose says
> > no, but I can't recall if 5.0-RELEASE printed it or not (I think it
> > does).
>
> boot -v on 5.0 does dump the $PIR.  Also, even without boot -v, you will
> see a line like:
>
> Using $PIR table, 7 entries at 0xc00fdf50
>
> If we find a $PIR.

Aye; reason we did not see it was that is not there; nor on 5.1 nor with
the above pir.c cmd.

Dw.