From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 25 01:45:06 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F0216A404
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from shaun@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from dione.picobyte.net (81-86-230-94.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.230.94])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E626E13C4AE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:45:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from shaun@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from charon.picobyte.net (charon.picobyte.net
	[IPv6:2001:770:15d::fe03])
	by dione.picobyte.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C07B881;
	Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:45:01 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:45:00 +0100
From: Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org>
To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@f2o.org>
Message-ID: <20070325014459.GB9447@charon.picobyte.net>
References: <20070320173358.01A2CB8C3@dione.picobyte.net>
	<A78FAF9B-EE04-48EC-BB30-74BD0FE9B212@f2o.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A78FAF9B-EE04-48EC-BB30-74BD0FE9B212@f2o.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 (FreeBSD i386)
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:45:06 -0000

On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:08:29PM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> 
> nrpe is listed as being out of date. However, for some reason, there  
> are two versions of nrpe in ports: nrpe at v1.9, nrpe2 at v2.7 (2.7.1  
> is the latest stable version, so the nrpe2 port is out of date)
> Would it make sense to remove the port for nrpe which is currently  
> unmaintained and rename nrpe2, which is maintained to just nrpe?

Yes, if nothing depends on nrpe 1 specifically. Of, if both ports are
kept, a version limit directive (for portscout) could be added to the
port Makefiles.

-- 
Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin
of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson