From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Sep 13 09:21:19 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA16403
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 09:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16397;
          Sun, 13 Sep 1998 09:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com)
Received: from localhost by echonyc.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA12650;
	Sun, 13 Sep 1998 12:21:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 12:21:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Snob Art Genre <benedict@echonyc.com>
Reply-To: ben@rosengart.com
To: jseger@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: xscreensaver
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.02.9809131216590.9639-100000@echonyc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Xscreensaver won't build; it says it's broken w/r/t libkrb.  But I found
that I could get it to build and run successfully with:

cd /usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver
make extract
cd work/xscreensaver-2.24
./configure --without-kerberos
cd ../..
make install

Why isn't this done by default?  I see no reason why people not using
kerberos should be deprived of xscreensaver just because it doesn't work
with kerberos.


 Ben

"You have your mind on computers, it seems." 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message