From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 10 18:05:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA03277 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.254.239.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA03272 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (mellon@localhost) by toccata.fugue.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with SMTP id SAA28278; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:05:28 -0700 Message-Id: <199606110105.SAA28278@toccata.fugue.com> cc: Jason Thorpe , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Swapped ethertype in BPF output? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jun 1996 17:56:29 PDT." Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:05:27 -0700 From: Ted Lemon Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Still, I feel like I might as well lean a little - this is > definitely bogus. (blush) And, of course, if I had looked more closely at the headers and noticed this was going to freebsd-hackers, I probably would have stated that a bit more politely. I do think it's bogus, but I don't know why it was done, and based on my experiences with FreeBSD people so far, I'm sure there was some good reason for doing it this way. So I am trying to lean on y'all about it, but you obviously have every right to lean back. Sorry for the offensive faux pas. :'( _MelloN_