From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 20 19:30:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A289BF861 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lab@gta.com) Received: from mailgate.gta.com (gb-ha.orl.gta.com [209.208.105.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467097B4 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lab@gta.com) Received: (qmail 41777 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Aug 2015 19:24:08 -0000 Date: 20 Aug 2015 19:24:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20150820192408.41776.qmail@mailgate.gta.com> From: lab@gta.com (Larry Baird) To: hrs@FreeBSD.org (Hiroki Sato) CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of print/ghostscript*-nox11 In-Reply-To: <20150821.022521.792759762853683209.hrs@allbsd.org> X-Newsgroups: freebsd.ports User-Agent: tin/2.3.1-20141224 ("Tallant") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE-p21 (i386)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:30:51 -0000 We have serveral headless FreeBSD servers that use the ghostscript nox11 port. We currently compile all of the ports on these boxes and have "OPTIONS_UNSET=X11" configured in /etc/make.conf. Just in case we ever switched to pre-compile ports, my vote would be for Plan B. But as long as there is a way to not require X11 on these boxes I can live with either plan. Larry -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Larry Baird Global Technology Associates, Inc. 1992-2012 | http://www.gta.com Celebrating Twenty Years of Software Innovation | Orlando, FL Email: lab@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220