From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 26 19:33:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148EE1065694 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from smtp1.tls.net (smtp1.tls.net [65.124.104.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51548FC17 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52882 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2009 19:33:20 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.3 ppid: 52821, pid: 52862, t: 5.0238s scanners: attach: 1.2.3 spam: 3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on smtp1.tls.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.2.1 Received: from 208-70-44-208.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.1.46?) (ldg@tls.net@208.70.44.208) by ssl-smtp1.tls.net with ESMTPA; 26 Oct 2009 19:33:15 -0000 Message-ID: <4AE5F967.2000706@pixelhammer.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:32:55 -0400 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200910231715.AA1453851224@mail.Go2France.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FW: DNS Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:33:22 -0000 krad wrote: > > a few massive assumptions here I feel. > > 1. all the domains are controlled by said person > 2. Are on the same server > 3. Fits with the relevent provisioning system, > 4. Is probably are using bind You betcha, though all good information. 1. Nope, the CNAME is not controlled by me. 2. Nope, the CNAMEd sites are on another provider. 3. Yes, it is possible by our support system. 4. Nope, no bind here. I have been reading the info everyone posted, and I configured a domain as I was asked. Since the reconfigured domain did no harm to my servers, I am inclined to let them do it. If it is the right thing to do, or the proper thing to do, seems to matter little those in the big offices. If they can find nowhere on the internet where it says "THOU SHALL NOT DO ", they believe is industry standard. So WTH, I'll do it, so long as it doesn't cause my pager to go beep in the night. I am too tired of arguing to keep it up anymore. Thanks, DAve -- "Posterity, you will know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." John Quincy Adams http://appleseedinfo.org