From owner-freebsd-gnome Mon Feb 10 13:59:46 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D8D37B401 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:59:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (f34.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4308143F75 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:59:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reigncracks@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:59:45 -0800 Received: from 68.103.37.247 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 21:59:44 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.103.37.247] From: "Mezz bsdforums.org" To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Adding fam to gnomevfs2 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:59:44 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2003 21:59:45.0081 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8ADBA90:01C2D14F] Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Does anyone object to me adding devel/fam as a dependency to gnomevfs2? >GNOME 2 really wants this to detect file changes, and we've historically >never enforced it. It's an optional dependency of gnomevfs2, but you >can disable it. Therefore, users that have FAM installed, will >automatically get it as a dependency now. Isn't fam something like automatic refresh? It helps with nautilus2 to do the automatic refresh when you change anything and nautilus2 will recoginze it change by itself when it's using with fam. Do I get the right idea? Well, what's avantage and disavantage for fam? Cheers, Mezz _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message