From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 22:38:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44A416A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:38:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from asarian-host.net (mail.asarian-host.net [194.109.160.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E728A43D3F for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:38:31 -0800 (PST) SRS0=qGiDRGin=GS=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Comments: To protect the identity of the sender, certain header fields are either not shown, or masked. Anonymous email accounts can be requested by filling in the appropriate form at: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi Received: (from root@localhost) by mail.asarian-host.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i2L6cUBq027213 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 07:38:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) From: Mark Received-SPF: pass (asarian-host.net: domain of admin@asarian-host.net designates sender IP as SASL permitted sender) Message-Id: <200403210638.I2L6CT0D027199@asarian-host.net> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 06:38:30 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net X-Trace: SIZosfDltuUrW+O0uAhAXNn59fXu1xCfi5G+D6VEpWqXMmlXHEL3Nvo9ARTpPbYVtd0xoRapCrTXSHgSYOuqUA== X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: References: <1079841282.664.10.camel@osaka> <20040321040035.GC2097@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUAQF04ZjFqW1BleBN9AQGuYwf/TxCNAxGmh9XHi4bRAr4aV4/yqX48w0iR /Zl2ZMoudOgTSSYeW1KV1stn9smJXSrUjojV+AnMQXiXCVy3SjIO7snzR/Ed7Syv /QR90D/7/ErQhYqIcBewc4NWjvrv4vTM4JRhfvlB1E2GvDHZTVPlGSYMNzOcbYtB 9aownsvojnYdxGHlMMjavul+EBFwM3eBLB8vFPuDBC/TTXfE+SWK7NgbwaMSpeq4 NgT6AY0iANmq/l8IT7toKOaxURt/amUaeZsFVsUcm+7OdKvGqWEF80VOkNRyBaZx gDQOrhslrjjbo/N7UGT/MhxFl2fzvmtGuMUaADiTwYbRp4cyTxKSyg== =THGN Subject: Re: Do I really need to rebuilding *everything* X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 06:38:32 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Nelson" To: "Rilindo Foster" Cc: Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 5:01 AM Subject: Re: Do I really need to rebuilding *everything* > > Question is, can I get away with rebuilding my entire > > ports collection? With about 300 apps complied, I really don't > > want to do it. ;_; > > You only need to rebuild the ports that use the openssl libs and > link statically. My guess is that would be zero. What do you mean? I built OpenSSL into everything; sendmail, Apache, qpopper, stunnel, php4, mod_perl, etc. Close to the 300 of the original poster. :) And like him, I really feel rather upset if I'd have to do it all over again. Or are all of the above dynamically linked? Thanks, - Mark