From owner-freebsd-mobile Fri Apr 6 14:39:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from sys708.peregrine.com (nat-150.peregrine.com [63.82.230.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C14D37B424 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 14:39:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erich@ucsd.edu) Received: from ucsd.edu (erichb2b.peregrine.com [172.17.8.102]) by sys708.peregrine.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f36KmjI79762; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 13:48:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erich@ucsd.edu) Message-ID: <3ACE2AE5.2030206@ucsd.edu> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 13:45:25 -0700 From: unsafe at any speed User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; 0.8.1) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "R.P. Aditya" Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: APM and NEC Versa 5060X References: <20010406133818.A57696@mighty.grot.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What does it say about apm at boot time? (See `dmesg`.) Do you have apm_enable="YES" and apmd_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf? Eric R.P. Aditya wrote: > I have 5.0 current from around March 23rd running on an NEC Versa 5060X laptop > that has a Phoenix BIOS (NEC version "39") and pruported support for APM. The > GENERIC kernel has "device apm" and booting with that, it doesn't seem that > FreeBSD recognizes that the BIOS supports APM.... > > hints? > > Thanks, > Adi > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message