From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 11 20:32:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB89B106566B for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844BC8FC0C for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29928; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:32:22 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201002112032.NAA29928@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:32:12 -0700 To: "Li, Qing" From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Routing problems on VPN servers running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:32:29 -0000 Qing: I will try to build a system late tonight. I was stuck in Washington, DC for four days due to snow and have just returned to a large backlog of work. Which snapshot would you recommend? --Brett Glass At 11:03 AM 2/11/2010, Li, Qing wrote: >Can you at least build one 8-stable system and see if the latest >patches resolve your problems before we carry on with the >"merge into 8-release" or other alternatives discussion ? > >-- Qing > > > >Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:41:38 -0700 >From: Brett Glass >To: "Li, Qing" , >Subject: RE: Routing problems on VPN servers running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE >Message-ID: <201002050541.WAA04703@lariat.net> >In-Reply-To: > > >Qing: > >What about the possibility of going to 7.3-RELEASE? There is a lot >that is good about 8.x, but when I build a production system I >prefer to use a release that will have extended support. After all, >it's awkward to build a production server that will need to be >taken down for a major upgrade in only one year. > >I know that 7.2-RELEASE had problems with routing and PPP too, but >they were different ones. Have the 7-STABLE branch been patched >adequately since that time? > >--Brett Glass