From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 11 2:22:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ox.lucas-nussbaum.net (cab-192023.calixo.net [213.166.192.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1881937B416 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 02:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by ox.lucas-nussbaum.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 192221724; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:22:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:22:01 +0100 From: Lucas Nussbaum To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: differences between 2-STABLE, 3-STABLE and 4-STABLE Message-ID: <20020111102201.GA5668@oxygene.in.schickler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I've successfully installed FreeBSD-2.1.5 on a 486 SX 25 with 4 MB RAM and 120 MB HD laptop. I was wondering if an upgrade to FreeBSD 3-STABLE or 4-STABLE would be interesting. What are the benefits ? Will it run faster, or has FreeBSD became bigger and bigger and slower and slower during the last 5 years ? The upgrade is possible by mounting the /usr/src and /usr/obj via NFS. I've already recompiled the kernel that way, so I know it works :) Thanks, lucas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message