Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 11:37:43 -0400 From: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r361352 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 Message-ID: <20200522153743.GC2512@raichu> In-Reply-To: <20200522151059.GK64045@kib.kiev.ua> References: <202005220118.04M1ItwO032876@repo.freebsd.org> <20200522151059.GK64045@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 06:10:59PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 01:18:55AM +0000, Mark Johnston wrote: > > Author: markj > > Date: Fri May 22 01:18:55 2020 > > New Revision: 361352 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361352 > > > > Log: > > Fix the build after r361033 when ACPI is disabled. > What is the sense in doing this for amd64 ? I doubt that we can boot > with ACPI disabled. It is possible to boot in virtualized environments without ACPI. I'm not sure why it is especially useful, but I wanted to avoid regressing a stable branch since at least one person noticed the breakage fairly quickly, and it is easy to fix.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200522153743.GC2512>