From owner-freebsd-current  Wed May 22 13:49:06 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA26006
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 22 May 1996 13:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nol.net (root@dazed.nol.net [206.126.32.101])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA25998
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 22 May 1996 13:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dazed.nol.net (blh@dazed.nol.net [206.126.32.101]) by nol.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA14215; Wed, 22 May 1996 15:48:02 -0500 (CDT)
X-AUTH: NOLNET SENDMAIL AUTH
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 15:47:59 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Brett L. Hawn" <blh@nol.net>
To: "Charles C. Figueiredo" <marxx@apocalypse.superlink.net>
cc: Paul Traina <pst@Shockwave.COM>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>,
        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: freebsd + synfloods + ip spoofing 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960522122204.3698A-100000@apocalypse.superlink.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960522154725.13907A-100000@dazed.nol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 22 May 1996, Charles C. Figueiredo wrote:

> 	You may be right, but other implementations don't randomize on every 
> connection either. FreeBSD, at the moment, just has what other 
> implementations have wrong.
> 

So we're to say 'well, they're wrong so its ok for us to be' ? I think not

Brett