From owner-freebsd-isdn Thu Jul 8 12:21: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from peedub.muc.de (newpc.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBD61505A for ; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:20:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA03946; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 21:20:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <199907081920.VAA03946@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Bart van Leeuwen Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hangup/redial.. Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 08 Jul 1999 19:11:49 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 21:20:53 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Bart van Leeuwen writes: >Is there any other debugging messages that I can get that may help >investigate this? use the debug flag to ifconfig. This will result in all kinds of trace being emitted by the sPPP module during negotiation. That may provide a clue. >On another side note, it would really really help a lot if it was possible >to stop i4b from dropping connections that it regards idle. >The very simple reason is that its impossible now to wait for an incomming >ip connection from another machine without continuesly creating unneeded >trafic yourself (a ping or whatever to keep your connection up) which is >simply expensive and creates trafic that noone is waiting for. > read isdnd.rc(5). Look at the various idle* parameters. Are you paying for traffic in addition to connect time ? That's even worse than here in Germany. --- Gary Jennejohn Home - garyj@muc.de Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message