From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Nov 2 06:41:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F278E51637 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 06:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from xmailer.gwdg.de (xmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BCE6F988 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 06:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from [134.76.11.221] (helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eA9Bk-0003mN-Rc; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:41:16 +0100 Received: from UM-EXCHT-A02.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.211) by um-excht-a01.um.gwdg.de (134.76.9.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 07:41:16 +0100 Received: from pc028.nfv.nw-fva.de (134.76.242.1) by email.gwdg.de (134.76.9.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 07:41:16 +0100 Subject: Re: Flavor or not for this port? To: L.Bartoletti References: CC: From: Rainer Hurling Message-ID: <46cbd287-186f-9b92-f2a7-d6884c681040@gwdg.de> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 07:41:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 06:41:26 -0000 Am 02.11.2017 um 07:13 schrieb L.Bartoletti: > Hi, > > I want to take x11-toolkits/qwt{5,6}-* > > Both are built for Qt4. I especially need qwt6 for Qt5. Since we have > flavors. Is it better to add a Qt5 flavor for Qwt6 or simply add a > x11-toolkits/qwt6-qt5 (like security/qtkeychain-qt{4,5} ?) > > Thanks. > > Regards. > > Loïc Hi Loïc, Thanks for your dedication. I am very interested in a qwt6-qt5 port, since it is needed for the upcoming version 3.0 of graphics/qgis :) Sorry for my inexperience. In case of adding the qwt6-qt5 as a flavor, should we expect any change or restriction in the way, it would be used as a dependency of e.g. QGIS? Thanks for any answer. Best wishes, Rainer