Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:31:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net> To: <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Good practice for /tmp Message-ID: <20010906192746.D18481-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20010906055708.P55388@hal9000.servehttp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Moved to questions from -security, with a BCC of this question to
-security. Those on -security who want to answer should post their
reponse to questions, and then we're done with this thread in
-security.)
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Andrew J Caines wrote:
> This doesn't obviously have a security angle, so feel free to take it to
> -questions (with CC, please).
>
> > > What makes you uncomfortable?
> > In the lines you quoted ? Nothing.
>
> Ok.
>
> > Having my swap partition mounted on a memory file system makes me
> > uncomfortable
>
> I think it's a bit misleading to say that the "swap partition" is mounted.
> I think it more accurate to say that the storage device which backs this
> filesystem is the system's VM. The filesystem simply provides the
> semantics for the I/O.
>
> What about this makes you uncomfortable?
Uhh, what happens when your machine panics? With a VM-backed
swap, savecore can't grab the crash dump; therefore, you can't get a
traceback.
--
Chris BeHanna
Software Engineer (Remove "bogus" before responding.)
behanna@bogus.zbzoom.net
I was raised by a pack of wild corn dogs.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010906192746.D18481-100000>