From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 16:17:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0161616A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:17:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0F843D4C for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2SGH4U5008990; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:17:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j2SGH2Pq008897; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:17:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:17:01 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Sconiers Message-ID: <20050328161701.GA3408@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Sconiers References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: code requirements / CVS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:17:05 -0000 On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:07:21AM -0600, John Sconiers wrote: > A group of coders will be porting complete reiserfs functionality over > to FreeBSD -current. The work will most likely be based on the > current read only project (http://dumbbell.nerim.net/index2.html) > published by Jean Pedron. I have two questions: > 1. What are the requirements for inclusion into the tree? We would > want the end result to be included if possible. Maybe as a kernel > module? Clear copyrights on the source code, something maintainable, etc... And since it will have GPL'ed bits, they cannot be required for a working kernel, nor can the FS be in GENERIC. A kernel module is fine. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)