Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:59:19 -0500 From: bsdzz <bsdzz@verizon.net> To: Aperez <alfredoj69@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why not? Message-ID: <42332DF7.2030309@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <20050312123840.19848c79.alfredoj69@gmail.com> References: <20050312123840.19848c79.alfredoj69@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>"On the other hand, no, Linux does not have that stupid notion of having totally separate kernel development for different issues. If you want a secure BSD, you get OpenBSD; if you want a usable BSD, you get FreeBSD; and if you want BSD on other architectures, you get NetBSD. That___s just idiotic, to have different teams worry about different things." > > > I guess Linus didn't have anything to say about the 200 different versions of Linux, with their 200 different installers, and 200 different file hierachies, and their multiple package management systems. >Why not all three teams work together for just one BSD version? > > If I remember correctly, there are multiple versions of BSD because the teams could not work together. thx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42332DF7.2030309>