From nobody Tue Sep 3 11:15:13 2024 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Wyjhd0zkNz5Mpf6 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 11:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wyjhc6L36z4Ldh for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725362112; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tNU60D2zsYa688pViYIBD7YNfWXuA9L6uD8nWu0EWa5ApFV3XEbIEbCuiwI8ZN0RHmb3xR ApDq9dOM+5D+8/9bkCL3DR3Hb6sQPqSkUC6fWILgdVtjHrH0PkG4ng85MaGSMjWv6TPqnh 2BZ3/ALCkIPx23FA17aH+Do47VV1D8fbNwThDOX0uKI2PwSUerQkWnHYCepYTQasX2xcOR 3deYdD+FtgqN9CNTNegnYWNfyPdUBgKx9pYJed9oDTVjmh0ypMiG/scmfU8u4+jAF8Cby2 XDc+rCAlmvqf/kKWnTSk3OluA6/g58T5S8rDZof3TTtMWxBL9PCmeQwMWpPy5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725362112; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J1JwW8XK8x5iCv8p7RQ6GcnTmgEomMRcjYjtiuicH0c=; b=fzidCNbS/5U+q2TEP8+lTQAvzlHRmF7j6tplTVrPr11nMrw4+bnv3+Lmsc6S5Pg2+75KXx 0NBeBIvnxF2Wv9tliWDYQcEhWcleoFNe/zWJAnLC1TEKyX+c0RwnGZyQIOId0/KhFgnAD7 tGtNTctnFwstOq1fV4UFdNathKP4wySOmD6QpEeoKvMhO5wi2GSGZHU8LGgqXZ3kHSSj3m uRgPsYU3J9A4yB0P7xbnEBk89xPUbov3p/1yraNYN54xfnkdvESjyE3GHM23xXd22Ay1lw 6EEgckzHeAdxSJJHS9KtDVQkPv1oktkJrc5+lnL1VWuNLJu8s8IeLFMRCwJKXw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wyjhc5vklzdTH for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 483BFCkV006369 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:15:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 483BFCEV006367 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:15:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 11:15:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marko.cupac@mimar.rs X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280532 --- Comment #6 from Marko Cupa=C4=87 --- (In reply to Stefan Bethke from comment #5) I can't speak for other users, but regarding forgejo I'm refugee from www/gitlab@ce which is maintenance nightmare. Upgrades, or even minor versi= on updates fail quite often. Forgejo (currently 7 branch) has all the functionality I need. AFAIK general purpose of any LTS is to not get too much attention from dev team, while st= ill getting enough attention from security team (meaning no new features while resolving stability and security issues). I wouldn't mind tracking latest and shiniest if forgejo upgrades to major versions don't introduce any problems. I guess only time will tell. I'm newbie to porting, I maintain a few simple ports where bumping revision= s in Makefile, `make makesum`-ing and generating new pkg-plist is all it takes. What do you think of the following: I copy your www/forgejo port from 7.x times, and maintain it by bumping revisions so you can concentrate on latest developments. If I run into problems I can't resolve on my own (eg. new min= or version of 7.x does not compile, or it does compile but won't work etc.), I= ask you for help. Thank you in advance, --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=