From owner-cvs-ports  Sun Jul  6 23:40:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA28332
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 23:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (ppp-206-170-32-212.snfc21.pacbell.net [206.170.32.212])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA28324;
          Sun, 6 Jul 1997 23:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shockwave.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA12519; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 23:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199707070637.XAA12519@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com.au>
cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/tcl75 Makefile ports/lang/tcl75/files Makefile.lib md5 ports/lang/tcl75/patches patch-aa patch-ae ports/lang/tcl75/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST ports/lang/tcl75/scripts post-patch 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jul 1997 14:23:02 +0800."
             <199707070623.OAA12415@spinner.dialix.com.au> 
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 23:37:09 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


  From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com.au>
  Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/tcl75 Makefile ports/lang/tcl75/files Mak
>>efile.lib md5 ports/lang/tcl75/patches patch-aa patch-ae ports/lang/tcl75/pkg
>> COMMENT DESCR PLIST ports/lang/tcl75/scripts post-patch 
  Paul Traina wrote:
  > pst         1997/07/06 20:32:39 PDT
  >     lang/tcl75/patches   patch-aa patch-ae 
  >   Log:
  >   Bring back TCL v7.5 -- this port is based on the v7.6 port.
                                                       ^^^^^
  
  Big mistake IMHO!  It should have been done as tcl76.  Also, is it v7.6 or 
  7.6p2?
  
I'm confused, what is the mistake?   There already is a tcl76 port.

Quite frankly, I hope no one will -ever- use the tcl75 port, but it's
there just in case someone MUST use tk41.  (I don't believe in breaking
things.)

The point of my message is that I brought back tcl75 using the port
conventions made in tcl76, so you can have 75 and 76 co-existing on
the same machine.

The old tcl75 port was horribly broken and out of date before it went
into the attic.