Date: Sun, 06 Jul 1997 23:37:09 -0700 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com.au> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/tcl75 Makefile ports/lang/tcl75/files Makefile.lib md5 ports/lang/tcl75/patches patch-aa patch-ae ports/lang/tcl75/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST ports/lang/tcl75/scripts post-patch Message-ID: <199707070637.XAA12519@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jul 1997 14:23:02 %2B0800." <199707070623.OAA12415@spinner.dialix.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com.au>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/tcl75 Makefile ports/lang/tcl75/files Mak
>>efile.lib md5 ports/lang/tcl75/patches patch-aa patch-ae ports/lang/tcl75/pkg
>> COMMENT DESCR PLIST ports/lang/tcl75/scripts post-patch
Paul Traina wrote:
> pst 1997/07/06 20:32:39 PDT
> lang/tcl75/patches patch-aa patch-ae
> Log:
> Bring back TCL v7.5 -- this port is based on the v7.6 port.
^^^^^
Big mistake IMHO! It should have been done as tcl76. Also, is it v7.6 or
7.6p2?
I'm confused, what is the mistake? There already is a tcl76 port.
Quite frankly, I hope no one will -ever- use the tcl75 port, but it's
there just in case someone MUST use tk41. (I don't believe in breaking
things.)
The point of my message is that I brought back tcl75 using the port
conventions made in tcl76, so you can have 75 and 76 co-existing on
the same machine.
The old tcl75 port was horribly broken and out of date before it went
into the attic.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707070637.XAA12519>