From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Jul 7 17:31:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF0637B406 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 17:31:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: from hornet.unixfreak.org (hornet [63.198.170.140]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BC43E28; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 17:31:03 -0700 (PDT) To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: to wrap or not to wrap - a question of style for doc/ tree PR's In-Reply-To: <20010707150751.A11446@hades.hell.gr>; from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr on "Sat, 7 Jul 2001 15:07:51 +0300" Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 17:31:03 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010708003103.29BC43E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Giorgos Keramidas writes: > The SGML sources of the doc/ tree are wrapped at 70 - 78 columns. > > However, when I am send-pr'ing changes, some times adding a tag here > and there makes the lines longer than the column that they were > originally wrapped. The dillema is, should I wrap the resulting SGML > before doing a `cvs dif -u' or not? I'd prefer that you minimize the diff. It's a lot easier to fix the style violation than to figure out if something changed on that line, or if you just decided to wrap it. Of course, if your patch rewrites the entire paragraph, please fill it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message