From owner-freebsd-multimedia Fri Mar 21 14:49:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA19739 for multimedia-outgoing; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 14:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from hda.hda.com (ip67-max1-fitch.ziplink.net [199.232.245.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA19731 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 14:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dufault@localhost) by hda.hda.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id QAA29475; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 16:05:52 -0500 From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199703212105.QAA29475@hda.hda.com> Subject: Re: Continquous Memory vs Virtual Memory In-Reply-To: <199703212214.PAA25609@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> from Steve Passe at "Mar 21, 97 03:14:06 pm" To: smp@csn.net (Steve Passe) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 16:05:52 -0500 (EST) Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, louie@TransSys.COM, petry@netwolf.NetMasters.com, multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > this is the possibility that I was refering to... I think that group protection to the device is adequate. There are few enough "customers" with the device that complex exploits aren't worth it and you can control who has access to the device. -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936