From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 22:55:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57FF16A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB6243D1D for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:55:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i2L6ttsR032749; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:55:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:55:55 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Mark Message-ID: <20040321065555.GE2097@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1079841282.664.10.camel@osaka> <20040321040035.GC2097@dan.emsphone.com> <200403210638.I2L6CT0D027199@asarian-host.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403210638.I2L6CT0D027199@asarian-host.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I really need to rebuilding *everything* X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 06:55:59 -0000 In the last episode (Mar 21), Mark said: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Nelson" > To: "Rilindo Foster" > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 5:01 AM > Subject: Re: Do I really need to rebuilding *everything* > > > > > Question is, can I get away with rebuilding my entire > > > ports collection? With about 300 apps complied, I really don't > > > want to do it. ;_; > > > > You only need to rebuild the ports that use the openssl libs and > > link statically. My guess is that would be zero. > > What do you mean? I built OpenSSL into everything; sendmail, Apache, > qpopper, stunnel, php4, mod_perl, etc. Close to the 300 of the original > poster. :) And like him, I really feel rather upset if I'd have to do it all > over again. Or are all of the above dynamically linked? The file command will indicate whether a program was linked static or dynamic. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com