From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 10 10:46:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6115E16A420 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from melon.pingpong.net (melon.pingpong.net [195.178.174.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016AA13C47E for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F3350855; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:46:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from melon.pingpong.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (melon.pingpong.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02672-01-15; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:46:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.187] (unknown [213.136.40.204]) by melon.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D28D50854; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:46:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:46:30 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn To: Erich Dollansky Message-ID: <74611C396F3A6D027B0E8ABA@rambutan.pingpong.net> In-Reply-To: <46E51D32.5070803@pacific.net.sg> References: <46E51D32.5070803@pacific.net.sg> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pingpong.net Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD or Intel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:46:33 -0000 --On m=E5ndag, september 10, 2007 18.32.18 +0800 Erich Dollansky=20 wrote: > Hi, > > Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> >> Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for >> performance reasons. Any comments on that? Are we better off getting AMD >> processors, when running Unix? >> > AMD announced today the new quad core. Their benchmarks are promising. > > But not the dual core versions. OK, thanks! But this means they can't deliver very soon, I guess, so I'd=20 better stick to woodcrest if I want to buy something soon. Thanks for your input! Palle