From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 19:37:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E954A43 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.i.noel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D7810D0 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hq4so7972045wib.14 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DIJpaLJAqcVZ6tHXIaW64a1/u9coYmYgUAMs9ep51EA=; b=n8joMRv+nKJhwioONY5/ETxO13zJt2pahL/p4EtvApDAkpZmK9ULAzWZXHuyFWSh6a Ck1+WAiBW2z+FqNiSShvp5NyBNk2eHVyQ/O4SSJoJ0T4OCljt3JzH7M0WD5zWLjT7XSp PmVi6r/CfzTbjN8kcGjKI8tZDioac8yzpJ6/F653hHFb36/nC/U2Y5fRsyvjhKcZzX/K N+QfztVkOQZJTJgfU0eGMU0rzy2PcxIdVwKXnEbbAoCGNNvTBO3rL6Wdfj713Y6AaJFw 0elY85mdh1FLtFK/nV6qwjJhI9/+DmcUzBZ+sCnnAsAz8rDG1tEl+dWMReZZG26nZ3SB FXkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.183.180 with SMTP id en20mr38006497wic.58.1373571432305; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.180.138 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130711120039.a99aeea20ecd078b9d29f18a@yahoo.es> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:37:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bulk] FreeBSD upgrade woes (8.3 -> 8.4) From: David Noel To: Mark Felder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Eduardo Morras X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.I.Noel@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:37:13 -0000 On 7/11/13, Mark Felder wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:00:39 -0500, Eduardo Morras > wrote: > >> Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a >> >> buggy kernel. > > This is not true to my knowledge. If buildkernel produced bad kernels with > > -j>1 we'd not allow you to do that without jumping through hoops. > If this is the case replacing the kernel should have no effect. But what then? Any thoughts?