From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Jan 18 01:14:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1402CB48F4 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911C61236 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0I1EJFi014769 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:14:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 215830] lib/libfetch regression Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:14:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:14:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215830 --- Comment #4 from John Hein --- (In reply to Dag-Erling Sm=C3=83=C2=B8rgrav from comment #3) The OP was claiming that something changed in libfetch after 6.4-RELEASE. = The broken Harvard ftp server was just his way to empirically observe that hypothesis. However, I could not reproduce his observation that 6.4 is different in this regard. Perhaps there is an environment difference on his end of which he was not aware. As such, the end result (closing this bug) is the same, but the reason for closure is subtly different (it could be more specific than "not a bug", but rather "unable to reproduce" - that is, we can't reproduce his reported suc= cess on 6.4, so it appears to _not_ be a post-6.4 behavior change). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=