Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:45:20 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FYI: Propolice for gcc-2.95.2 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011180042580.40759-100000@achilles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20001117181107.B33370@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 06:08:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > My concern would be if we put this into the 2.95.2 tree that we have. > > It won't go in. Period. Perhaps <large blinking disclaimer> if it works well </large blinking disclaimer>, the patch can be put into contrib, and there can be a single switch to throw that will cause the patch to be applied during buildworld, resulting in everything being compiled with the stack protection as well. (Assuming the world is compiled with the just-compiled compiler, I'm not too familiar with the innards of the build process.) Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0011180042580.40759-100000>