Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 15:45:18 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), toor@dyson.iquest.net, dyson@freebsd.org, karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FYI: regarding our rfork(2) Message-ID: <199709192145.PAA20992@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199709192130.OAA05946@usr06.primenet.com> References: <199709192104.PAA20740@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199709192130.OAA05946@usr06.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > In any case, I'm convinced that it's necessary in order to fully support > > C-Threads. > > Stacks in seperate address spaces are needed to fully support C-Threads? I'm convinced that you must *fully* share thread stacks in order to be backwards compatible for C-Threads. You don't *have* to do that, but then we're no longer backwards compatible. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709192145.PAA20992>