From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 15:42:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B565637B401; Thu, 1 May 2003 15:42:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE82043FB1; Thu, 1 May 2003 15:42:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (acs-24-154-229-196.zoominternet.net [24.154.229.196]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h41MgMZK038112; Thu, 1 May 2003 18:42:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 18:40:16 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Ceri Davies Message-Id: <20030501184016.7fb600c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030501224003.GD30996@submonkey.net> References: <20030430172501.1798C2A7EA@canning.wemm.org> <200305011513.h41FDNmw017479@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20030501224003.GD30996@submonkey.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: www@FreeBSD.org cc: david@catwhisker.org Subject: Re: Subscriptions to/for freebsd-ww@freebsd.org list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 22:42:31 -0000 On Thu, 1 May 2003 23:40:03 +0100 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:13:23AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > >To: David Wolfskill > > >Cc: admin@FreeBSD.ORG > > >Subject: Re: Subscriptions to/for freebsd-ww@freebsd.org list? > > >Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:25:01 -0700 > > >From: Peter Wemm > > > > >David Wolfskill wrote: > > >> We have 3 pending subscriptions for the freebsd-www@freebsd.org list > > >> so far. > > > > >> What are the criteria for accepting or rejecting such requests? > > > > >> I'm willing to take care of them, once I understand the application of > > >> an answer to that question. > > > > >... > > > > >Its probably best to ask the www/doc folks what the arrangement is supposed > > >to be. > > > > OK, www@ folks: what is your pleasure on this? > > I was under the impression (until seanc told me otherwise about 4 weeks ago, > as he was trying to subscribe) that www was an open list anyway. Do you know > who was looking after this before the move to mailman ? > > Also, are current subscribers to the freebsd-www@ list committers (or similar) > only? If not, I can't see any reason not to open the list to all subscribers, > but really we need to establish who has been approving subscription requests > all this time and ask them what grounds they were basing approval and denial on. > *mumble* I still think that freebsd-www should be merged into freebsd-doc *mumble* -- Tom Rhodes