From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 12:21:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C128816A4CE for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:21:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail44.e.nsc.no (mail44.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC79443D41 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:21:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from janchris@stud.ntnu.no) Received: from [192.168.123.1] (ti500710a080-8072.bb.online.no [83.109.207.138]) by mail44.nsc.no (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBBCLYTP029808; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:21:34 +0100 (CET) From: "Jan C. Meyer" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:19:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20041209074943.GA32126@alzatex.com> <44hdmu3sky.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44hdmu3sky.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412111319.11757.janchris@stud.ntnu.no> cc: Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: RTL8139 Cardbus Card fails to activate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: janchris@stud.ntnu.no List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:21:43 -0000 On Friday 10 December 2004 19:40, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Jan Christian Meyer writes: > > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > Separate parts of the system? Hardware discovery and Cardbus? > > > Those seem about as closely related as any two features could be... > > > > I don't find this to be obvious at all, but it's good that someone does. > > May I trouble you to shed some light on the matter, or provide me with a > > reference? > > What's unclear, exactly? That hardware discovery and Cardbus > functionality are closely related? Or some specific aspect > of one of those? Attempting to phrase what confuses me as succinctly as I might: - If ACPI is responsible for managing the detection and attachment of my network card, why does the card work when ACPI is disabled? - If ACPI is not responsible for managing my card, how/why is it able to interfere with said card's operation? Kind regards, -Jan Christian