From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 4 11:57:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA05032 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from premise.CS.Berkeley.EDU (root@premise.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.172]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA05027 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:57:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from premise.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost.Berkeley.EDU [127.0.0.1]) by premise.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA03405; Tue, 4 Jun 1996 11:56:39 -0700 Message-Id: <199606041856.LAA03405@premise.CS.Berkeley.EDU> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96 To: Motonori Shindou cc: bmah@cs.berkeley.edu, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: route command w/o metrics (why?) In-reply-to: Your message of "04 Jun 1996 11:32:54 +0200." <31B3A056.5AF0.002@pmail.tepco.co.jp> From: bmah@cs.berkeley.edu (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-to: bmah@cs.berkeley.edu X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 11:56:35 -0700 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Motonori Shindou writes: > > As a historical point, older BSD versions used to use the metric to > > distinguish between routes to directly-attached networks and routes > > through gateways. I always wondered why it couldn't figure this out > > from the list of interfaces in kernel. [snip] > In general, does the system that requires metric paramter in "route add" > command keep that metric in the kernel? I believe that it does, but I'm sure that there's someone else reading this with a more definitive answer. Bruce.