From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Thu Apr 27 23:46:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA95D5362A; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 23:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E18541CE8; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 23:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 975) id 161F353DA; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 23:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 23:46:23 +0000 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Boris Samorodov Cc: Vsevolod Stakhov , Ian Lepore , Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r439421 - in head/www/nginx: . files Message-ID: <20170427234623.GG18747@FreeBSD.org> References: <201704252318.v3PNI9Io032993@repo.freebsd.org> <20170426165333.GC18747@FreeBSD.org> <1426aa14-e30f-bb33-6e76-5fdfdd222e74@FreeBSD.org> <20170427164627.GE18747@FreeBSD.org> <1493312147.66427.6.camel@freebsd.org> <1fb15b0d-db5c-3707-6821-50cc4f57cb8e@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 23:46:24 -0000 On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:26:12AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 27.04.2017 20:09, Vsevolod Stakhov пишет: > > > Come on, 20 years is enough time frame to state that IPv6 must be > > supported by any sane OS. I'd vote to remove this legacy knob from the > > ports completely (and that will simplify pkg job as well). > > Well, I'll speak only about me and my $JOB. We have several tens of > servers out there. And *none* of them have IPV6. *We* don't need it. > > Unfortunately, the majority of them run Linuxes. Well, I see your > point. But then... we'll just have more Linuxes. That's it. > > BTW, I don't ask someone to maintain code/patches for me. I just say > do whatever you want and get pleasure. Life will not stop. I don't think I fully understand your concern. On your boxes you have disabled IPv6, so in your situation you can use both types packages: a package built on a box with IPv6 (I guess IPv6 hasn't been enabled in nginx.conf yet) as well as a package built on a your boxes with IPv6 disabled. -- Sergey A. Osokin osa@FreeBSD.org