From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Jan 25 08:33:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA65CC0D09; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12BF414AF; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cWJ1W-0007T8-BB; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 09:33:46 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 09:33:46 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm , Bernd Walter , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports? Message-ID: <20170125083346.GU13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170125042413.GK85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125062045.GS13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125075459.GL85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <87BFEE93-7617-4131-832B-BE697D352E0D@dsl-only.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87BFEE93-7617-4131-832B-BE697D352E0D@dsl-only.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:33:47 -0000 Hi!! Mark wrote: > In the run-up to a release, a number of -BETA and -RC releases may be published for testing purposes. These releases are only supported for a few weeks, as resources permit, and will not be listed as supported on this page. Users are strongly discouraged from running these releases on production systems. > > B) 11.0-RELEASE would have made 11.0-RC1 not be supported > (if 11.0-RC1 was even supported for that long). > > C) stable/11 is supported > > D) head is "supported" (no complaint anyway). HEAD is for testing, it's not supported in the word-smithing kind of way 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !