Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:13:35 +0200 (EET) From: Domas Mituzas <midom@delfi.lt> To: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org> Cc: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Chrooted bind out of the box Message-ID: <20020107160902.J43640-100000@axis.tdd.lt> In-Reply-To: <20020107090632.P95067@buffoon.automagic.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi there, > ... and I would sooner run named in a chroot jail in a standard > way than introduce FreeBSDisms that aren't going to be easily > administered by people more familiar with other platforms. with all great respect I would accept jail() syscall instead (or in addition to) chroot() for named. No need to use jail(8). Of course, it will be FreeBSDism, but an advanced one. Of course, options for named.conf should be added too. Of course, IP imprisonment should be considered. Regards, Domas Mituzas DELFI Internet, UAB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020107160902.J43640-100000>