From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Jan 29 04:03:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CCDA725B1; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 04:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A66117B; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 04:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 34CE91119; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 04:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 04:03:19 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Adam Weinberger Cc: Adam Weinberger , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r407331 - head/net/geoipupdate Message-ID: <20160129040319.GA58352@FreeBSD.org> References: <201601270116.u0R1G1Vl041516@repo.freebsd.org> <20160129015402.GA96343@FreeBSD.org> <17E923F7-F432-46B5-BF9F-C77D3BB9B0BE@adamw.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17E923F7-F432-46B5-BF9F-C77D3BB9B0BE@adamw.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 04:03:19 -0000 On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:51:55PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On 28 Jan, 2016, at 18:54, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:16:01AM +0000, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> New Revision: 407331 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/407331 > >> > >> [...] > >> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > >> bin/geoipupdate > >> -@sample etc/GeoIP.conf.sample > >> +@sample etc/GeoIP.conf etc/GeoIP.conf.default > > > > I think you've got it backwards, per what I read in CHANGE@20150926 and > > running post-install() from +MANIFEST with commands prepended with echo: > > [...] > > Oh! You're totally right. I got confused by the wording from the > porters-handbook. > > "@sample file [file]" doesn't do much to resolve ambiguity :-P Yes, I agree that "@sample file [file]" is not the best wording. But in that section 7.3, there's a Note with correct and more clear example. > I'd suggest adding, after the first paragraph of 7.6.9: > > So, > @sample etc/myapp.conf.sample > and > @sample etc/myapp.conf.sample etc/myapp.conf > are equivalent. Yeah, perhaps some clarification of this sort could be helpful. ./danfe