From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 20 23:08:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8669F16A4CE for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 23:08:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from asarian-host.net (mail.asarian-host.net [194.109.160.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D407543D1D for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 23:08:35 -0800 (PST) SRS0=qGiDRGin=GS=asarian-host.net=admin@asarian-host.net) Comments: To protect the identity of the sender, certain header fields are either not shown, or masked. Anonymous email accounts can be requested by filling in the appropriate form at: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi Received: (from root@localhost) by mail.asarian-host.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i2L78YHu028006 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 08:08:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from admin@asarian-host.net) From: Mark Received-SPF: pass (asarian-host.net: domain of admin@asarian-host.net designates sender IP as SASL permitted sender) Message-Id: <200403210708.I2L78Y8J027993@asarian-host.net> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 07:08:34 GMT X-Authenticated-Sender: admin@asarian-host.net X-Trace: XMcsnV9rqrKXu2QkGbIRf6tnFcuG+WEPikfH3W7ktsomPKbcbQRsl49Tys7H+gbsUkneLHLCHr4h6TQwUedzLw== X-Complaints-To: abuse@asarian-host.net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers, otherwise we are unable to process your complaint Organization: Asarian-host To: References: <1079841282.664.10.camel@osaka> <20040321040035.GC2097@dan.emsphone.com> <200403210638.I2L6CT0D027199@asarian-host.net> <20040321065555.GE2097@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Auth: Asarian-host PGP signature iQEVAwUAQF0/cjFqW1BleBN9AQGgzgf9GBai/Z/sFxh8w//68E9SIkU3Y7hnhUKf FYcKPVlNc9LuspKOaBdeq2BosIQtY21QxydRJ04b9Vewt/YZRBns/dJ14upu0OoZ wdKbA7CTqXswa+BUsZk24HbZhm7zHfUASxcVULBlSNXilfC99jletffusUP4lQ46 oZIE8e5Be/wrV4bXNX+6Lx5MSRCWl1yi6uBC8vu4b20ZfrOLhGMBnk4Ohhr9iBlA GmnuGXp5Cw3eCuKfDyxfmJIKScCSL0oMbOeymW0PiWMqXdztds3R6MYfboOtVPsH J5VYdnU14untKwPY6Xr0ipzKOg+qrk4xZzBhlmbSQ0zvJvPkc6JppQ== =MX2r Subject: Re: Do I really need to rebuilding *everything* X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 07:08:36 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Nelson" To: "Mark" Cc: Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 7:55 AM Subject: Re: Do I really need to rebuilding *everything* > > > > Question is, can I get away with rebuilding my entire > > > > ports collection? With about 300 apps complied, I really > > > > don't want to do it. ;_; > > > > > > You only need to rebuild the ports that use the openssl libs > > > and link statically. My guess is that would be zero. > > > > What do you mean? I built OpenSSL into everything; sendmail, > > Apache, qpopper, stunnel, php4, mod_perl, etc. Close to the 300 > > of the original poster. :) And like him, I really feel rather upset if > > I'd have to do it all over again. Or are all of the above > > dynamically linked? > > The file command will indicate whether a program was linked static > or dynamic. Pardon my daftness, but how is a 'file' against, say, httpd, like this, file /usr/local/sbin/httpd /usr/local/sbin/httpd: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped going to tell me whether httpd was dynamically linked against OpenSSL, or statically? It just tells me httpd uses shared libraries. Or does it mean it ONLY uses shared libraries? Thanks, - Mark