From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 22 13:10:48 1994 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA16870 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 13:10:48 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA16863 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 21:10:44 GMT Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id NAA10241; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 13:10:27 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.9/8.6.5) with SMTP id NAA02594; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 13:10:26 -0800 Message-Id: <199412222110.NAA02594@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Doug Rabson cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NQNFS In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 22 Dec 94 14:55:51 GMT." <199412221455.OAA00894@trout.render.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 13:10:25 -0800 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >Is anyone using NQNFS live? I just tried it out and it appears to be >a bit flakey. I think that there are a few cache coherency problems >in there somewhere. Maybe they will be helped by the VM-buffer cache >stuff. > >How usable is the VMIO stuff? Is it going to make it for 2.1? It is working and it will be in 2.1. There are a few performance issues and minor bugs that need to be worked out before I commit it to CVS. -DG