From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Feb 17 18:39:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from joshua.site-fx.net (ajhm54hby52pi.bc.hsia.telus.net [66.183.47.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0D737B400 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 18:39:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from agent-orange.site-fx.net (gateway.site-fx.net [192.168.1.1]) by joshua.site-fx.net (8.12.1/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g1GHiFv6007902; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 09:44:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: BIND vs djbdns From: "James A. Peltier" To: GB Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <000d01c1b69e$dd38a6d0$0201a8c0@CITYMOUSE> References: <000d01c1b69e$dd38a6d0$0201a8c0@CITYMOUSE> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 16 Feb 2002 09:44:23 -0800 Message-Id: <1013881463.2872.1.camel@agent-orange.site-fx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG BIND is included in most UNIX operating systems. BIND is even the base for the Windows 2000 Nameserver. Best to learn BIND as you will find it implemented more than djbdns. That said though I am personally migrating my DNS over to djbdns. On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 20:03, GB wrote: > Folks, > > Not to start a flame war, but does anyone have opinions/advice on BIND9 > vs. djbdns? > > The former is the worldwide standard; the latter seems simpler and more > secure. Simpler appeals to me, since I'm still scratching my head after > reading several BIND HOWTOs. > > Any thoughts appreciated! > > Greg B. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- -James Hardware, n.: The parts of a computer system that can be kicked. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message