Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:12:19 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> To: FreeBSD-PORTS <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Some advice. (On topic :P) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011071708210.87401-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I put together the www/linux-flashplugin port back in Feburary before netscape started including it into their linux (and other?) navigator distributions. This started around 4.74 or maybe 4.75, I don't quite remember which yet. My question is, now that it is included with[as a part of] netscape, should the port be removed as redundant? Or rather, should it be left in for those who either have not upgraded netscape versions, or for those who wish not to upgrade? It's my first time dealing with a port that's been made redundant by a software release like this, and all around, I haven't made & submitted a lot of ports before (3 maybe) so I'm unsure as to the process of this. Thanks again for any advice. Regards, Matt Heckaman * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.qc.ca http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ * * GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE6CH5EdMMtMcA1U5ARAqwnAKCVQ4mMkJ2E18SxA3IE4LMGRZozdwCeMCZu eEXEfaQQ6iLN8fvlU1HrUiM= =7MUa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0011071708210.87401-100000>