From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 13 08:39:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52042AA7 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1419E63E for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.60.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453DF3B8A2; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3D8ddlV097930; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:39:40 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Slawa Olhovchenkov Subject: Re: default file descriptor limit ? In-reply-to: <20150413083159.GN1394@zxy.spb.ru> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <78759.1428912996@critter.freebsd.dk> <79209.1428913320@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150413083159.GN1394@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <97928.1428914379.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:39:39 +0000 Message-ID: <97929.1428914379@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:39:42 -0000 -------- In message <20150413083159.GN1394@zxy.spb.ru>, Slawa Olhovchenkov writes: >> >This wastes tons of pointless close system calls in programs which >> >use the suboptimal but best practice: >> > >> > for (i = 3; i < sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX); i++) >> > close(i); >> > >> >For reference Linux seems to default to 1024, leaving it up to >> >massive server processes to increase the limit for themselves. > >This is typical only on startup, I think? No. This is mandatory whenever you spawn an sub process with less privilege. >May be now time to introduce new login class, for desktop users, [...] How about "now is the time to realize that very few processes need more than a few tens of filedescriptors" ? If Linux can manage with a hardcoded default of 1024, so can we... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.