From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  2 21:05:56 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F796106566B
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 May 2012 21:05:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from lab.alexdupre.com
	(alexdupre-1-pt.tunnel.tserv23.zrh1.ipv6.he.net
	[IPv6:2001:470:25:450::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C179E8FC17
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 May 2012 21:05:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 53017 invoked from network); 2 May 2012 21:05:54 -0000
Received: from atom.alexdupre.com (HELO ?192.168.178.12?)
	(sysadmin@alexdupre.com@192.168.178.12)
	by lab.alexdupre.com with ESMTPSA; 2 May 2012 21:05:54 -0000
Message-ID: <4FA1A1AF.3050503@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 23:05:51 +0200
From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
References: <20120502182557.GA93838@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
In-Reply-To: <20120502182557.GA93838@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: current@freebsd.org, net@frebsd.org
Subject: Re: fast bcopy...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:05:56 -0000

Luigi Rizzo ha scritto:
>     For small blocks and multiples of 32-64 bytes, i noticed that
>     the following is a lot faster (breaking even at about 1 KBytes)
>
> 	static inline void
> 	fast_bcopy(void *_src, void *_dst, int l)
> 	{
> 		uint64_t *src = _src;
> 		uint64_t *dst = _dst;
> 		for (; l>  0; l-=32) {
> 			*dst++ = *src++;
> 			*dst++ = *src++;
> 			*dst++ = *src++;
> 			*dst++ = *src++;
> 		}
> 	}

DJB influence? :-)

-- 
Alex Dupre