From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 05:31:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC0137B401; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 05:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from otter3.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA74243FBD; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 05:31:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from centtech.com (electron.centtech.com [204.177.173.173]) by otter3.centtech.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3ACVY56060110; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:31:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <3E95641D.1080100@centtech.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:31:25 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Gilbert References: <3E94A22D.174321F0@lbl.gov> <3E94A8C4.3A196E42@lbl.gov> <16020.61355.551242.159558@canoe.velocet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org cc: "Jin Guojun \[DSD\]" Subject: Re: tcp_output starving -- is due to mbuf get delay? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:31:36 -0000 David Gilbert wrote: >>>>>>"Jin" == Jin Guojun <[DSD]" > writes: >>>>> > > Jin> Some details was left behind -- The machine is 2 GHz Intel P4 > Jin> with 1 GB memory, so the delay is not from either CPU or lack of > Jin> memory. > > I just want to quickly jump in with the comment that our GigE tests of > routing through FreeBSD have exposed several-order-of-magnitude > differences by changing ram/motherboard/which-slot-the-card-is-in. > > Do not assume that a fast CPU is the key. We went through 10 > motherboards to commission the current routers ... and sometimes > faster cpus would route slower (in various combinations of > motherboards and RAM). Wow - this is very interesting. I have two machines with GigE in them, one has 6 gige nics (intel pro/1000T server), in a dual Xeon 1.5Ghz (P4), with 2gb of ram. I haven't put it into production yet, so if there are any tests I can do, let me know. It would be good to know the pitfalls before I bring it up live.. :) Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Attitudes are contagious, is yours worth catching? ------------------------------------------------------------------