Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:04:30 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xawtv, ioctl_bt848 header and bento Message-ID: <200306092304.30368.linimon@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20030610032156.GA96759@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030610005036.2a83f380.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20030610032156.GA96759@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 09 June 2003 10:21 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Thats why I put > > > > .if !exists(/usr/include/machine/ioctl_bt848.h) > > BROKEN= No ioctl_bt848.h on this architecture > > .endif > > > > into the Makefile. But as the actuall bento log > > (http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/alpha-4-latest/xawtv-3.88.log) shows > > me, the port still does not "broke" in the right way. I tried it for my > > self on a 4/alpha system and I got what I expected to get: IMHO those 3 lines should be replaced by: NOT_FOR_ARCHS= alpha which should do exactly what you want (i.e., not generate bogus error reports). There are several Makefiles that still attempt to use various logic to decide whether they are BROKEN or not. In general the cleverness gets in the way. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306092304.30368.linimon>