From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Thu Oct 27 13:28:19 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC724C15428
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:28:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1CFEAB
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:28:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9RDSJin061556
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:28:19 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 213474] sed behavior change with a/i/c operands.
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:28:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: bin
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: kpect@protonmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-213474-8-RGynV5sS7r@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-213474-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-213474-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:28:19 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213474

--- Comment #4 from Sergey <kpect@protonmail.com> ---
(In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #3)

In my humble opinion it's a bad decision.
In that case i'd rather patch sed's source like this:

        # Restore original BSD sed
        sed -E -i '' \
                -e '/           p =3D lbuf;/ a\
                \               EATSPACE();' \
        usr.bin/sed/compile.c

I suppose FreeBSD shuld remain authenic and must not rush after Linux, as t=
he
ones who like Linux will use Linux, not BSD. FreeBSD should not copy or be
'like' Linux because it will never be on par with it... Why not to import
coreutils in this case? FreeBSD has it's own benefits and should keep 'em.
Those who migrate from Linux seek for something else/something new and not
another linux with different name.

Regards,
Sergey.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=